Protecting Workplace Information Course: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

Questionário temático sem limite de tempo: 18 perguntas sobre Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report, com uma explicação depois de cada resposta. As perguntas e respostas são baralhadas de cada vez.

  • Curso
  • Canadá
  • 98 perguntas
  • Verificado em 13 de outubro de 2026
  • Verificado em 13 de outubro de 2026
Comece pelas liçõesProtecting Workplace Information Course: Lessons: cerca de 150 minutos de leitura. Todas as perguntas do teste são abordadas nas lições.

Questionário temático 6: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

  1. Pergunta 1 de 18

    Under PIPEDA, which three events count as a breach of security safeguards?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. Loss of, unauthorized access to, or unauthorized disclosure of personal information

    PIPEDA defines a breach of security safeguards as the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information.

  2. Pergunta 2 de 18

    A box of employee files goes missing during an office move. What type of breach is this?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: A. Loss

    Information that goes missing, including during an office move, is a loss.

  3. Pergunta 3 de 18

    A fax with patient information goes to the wrong number. What type of breach is this?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Unauthorized disclosure

    Misdirected email, fax or mail is unauthorized disclosure.

  4. Pergunta 4 de 18

    A receptionist reads her ex-partner's file in the clinic's system just to see it. What type of breach is this?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: A. Unauthorized access

    An employee viewing records without permission is unauthorized access, even if the information is not shared.

  5. Pergunta 5 de 18

    What is employee snooping?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. Looking at personal information without authorization or a business purpose

    The OPC defines snooping as accessing personal information without authorization and without a legitimate business purpose.

  6. Pergunta 6 de 18

    Which practice helps employers detect and deter employee snooping?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: A. Keeping access logs and reviewing them regularly

    Access logs and regular audits support investigations and deter snooping when employees know they exist.

  7. Pergunta 7 de 18

    On Monday morning you find a cabinet of personnel files unlocked and open. It was left that way overnight. What should you do first?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Report it right away to your supervisor or privacy officer

    Report possible breaches at once so the organization can contain and assess them; do not investigate on your own.

  8. Pergunta 8 de 18

    A breach was caused by a hacked user account. Which containment step does the OPC list?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. Reset the affected passwords right away

    The OPC's containment tips include resetting affected passwords immediately when a hacked account caused the breach.

  9. Pergunta 9 de 18

    A laptop with client records is lost. Which containment step does the OPC suggest, if possible?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: D. Wipe its memory remotely

    If a laptop is lost or stolen, the OPC suggests wiping its memory remotely if possible.

  10. Pergunta 10 de 18

    Why should evidence be preserved after a breach?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. It helps find the cause and prevent future breaches

    The OPC says preserving evidence helps identify the cause and prevent future breaches.

  11. Pergunta 11 de 18

    Under PIPEDA, what test decides whether a breach must be reported to the OPC?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. Whether it creates a real risk of significant harm

    Organizations must report and notify when it is reasonable to believe a breach creates a real risk of significant harm.

  12. Pergunta 12 de 18

    A breach could cause a person to lose their job. Does that count as significant harm under PIPEDA?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Yes, loss of employment is included

    Significant harm includes loss of employment, along with financial loss, identity theft, humiliation and other harms.

  13. Pergunta 13 de 18

    Which two main factors decide whether a breach creates a real risk of significant harm?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. How sensitive the information is and how likely misuse is

    The assessment looks at the sensitivity of the information and the probability it will be misused.

  14. Pergunta 14 de 18

    A breach affects only one customer. Does the real risk of significant harm test still apply?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Yes, the same test applies to one person or 1,000

    The OPC notes the requirement applies whether a breach affects one person or 1,000.

  15. Pergunta 15 de 18

    When must the people affected by a reportable breach be notified under PIPEDA?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. As soon as feasible once the risk is found

    Individuals must be notified as soon as feasible after the organization determines the breach poses a real risk of significant harm.

  16. Pergunta 16 de 18

    When may an organization use indirect notice, such as a public announcement, instead of contacting people directly?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: A. When direct notice would cause more harm or hardship, or contacts are unknown

    Indirect notice is allowed only when direct notice would cause further harm or undue hardship, or contact information is unavailable.

  17. Pergunta 17 de 18

    A breach does not create a real risk of significant harm. What must a PIPEDA organization still do?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: A. Keep a record of it for two years

    Records must be kept of every breach of security safeguards, whether or not it creates a real risk of significant harm, for two years.

  18. Pergunta 18 de 18

    Under Alberta's PIPA, when must an organization notify Alberta's Privacy Commissioner of a breach with a real risk of significant harm?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Without unreasonable delay, even before its investigation ends

    Alberta's OIPC says notice must be given without unreasonable delay and should not wait for the internal investigation to finish.

Testes relacionados