Protecting Workplace Information Course: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

Quiz tematico senza limite di tempo: 18 domande su Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report, con una spiegazione dopo ogni risposta. Domande e risposte vengono mescolate ogni volta.

  • Corso
  • Canada
  • 98 domande
  • Verificato: 13 ottobre 2026
  • Verificato il 13 ottobre 2026
Inizia dalle lezioniProtecting Workplace Information Course: Lessons: circa 150 minuti di lettura. Ogni domanda del test è trattata nelle lezioni.

Quiz tematico 6: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

  1. Domanda 1 di 18

    Under PIPEDA, which three events count as a breach of security safeguards?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: B. Loss of, unauthorized access to, or unauthorized disclosure of personal information

    PIPEDA defines a breach of security safeguards as the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information.

  2. Domanda 2 di 18

    A box of employee files goes missing during an office move. What type of breach is this?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: A. Loss

    Information that goes missing, including during an office move, is a loss.

  3. Domanda 3 di 18

    A fax with patient information goes to the wrong number. What type of breach is this?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: C. Unauthorized disclosure

    Misdirected email, fax or mail is unauthorized disclosure.

  4. Domanda 4 di 18

    A receptionist reads her ex-partner's file in the clinic's system just to see it. What type of breach is this?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: A. Unauthorized access

    An employee viewing records without permission is unauthorized access, even if the information is not shared.

  5. Domanda 5 di 18

    What is employee snooping?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: B. Looking at personal information without authorization or a business purpose

    The OPC defines snooping as accessing personal information without authorization and without a legitimate business purpose.

  6. Domanda 6 di 18

    Which practice helps employers detect and deter employee snooping?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: A. Keeping access logs and reviewing them regularly

    Access logs and regular audits support investigations and deter snooping when employees know they exist.

  7. Domanda 7 di 18

    On Monday morning you find a cabinet of personnel files unlocked and open. It was left that way overnight. What should you do first?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: C. Report it right away to your supervisor or privacy officer

    Report possible breaches at once so the organization can contain and assess them; do not investigate on your own.

  8. Domanda 8 di 18

    A breach was caused by a hacked user account. Which containment step does the OPC list?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: B. Reset the affected passwords right away

    The OPC's containment tips include resetting affected passwords immediately when a hacked account caused the breach.

  9. Domanda 9 di 18

    A laptop with client records is lost. Which containment step does the OPC suggest, if possible?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: D. Wipe its memory remotely

    If a laptop is lost or stolen, the OPC suggests wiping its memory remotely if possible.

  10. Domanda 10 di 18

    Why should evidence be preserved after a breach?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: C. It helps find the cause and prevent future breaches

    The OPC says preserving evidence helps identify the cause and prevent future breaches.

  11. Domanda 11 di 18

    Under PIPEDA, what test decides whether a breach must be reported to the OPC?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: B. Whether it creates a real risk of significant harm

    Organizations must report and notify when it is reasonable to believe a breach creates a real risk of significant harm.

  12. Domanda 12 di 18

    A breach could cause a person to lose their job. Does that count as significant harm under PIPEDA?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: C. Yes, loss of employment is included

    Significant harm includes loss of employment, along with financial loss, identity theft, humiliation and other harms.

  13. Domanda 13 di 18

    Which two main factors decide whether a breach creates a real risk of significant harm?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: B. How sensitive the information is and how likely misuse is

    The assessment looks at the sensitivity of the information and the probability it will be misused.

  14. Domanda 14 di 18

    A breach affects only one customer. Does the real risk of significant harm test still apply?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: C. Yes, the same test applies to one person or 1,000

    The OPC notes the requirement applies whether a breach affects one person or 1,000.

  15. Domanda 15 di 18

    When must the people affected by a reportable breach be notified under PIPEDA?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: B. As soon as feasible once the risk is found

    Individuals must be notified as soon as feasible after the organization determines the breach poses a real risk of significant harm.

  16. Domanda 16 di 18

    When may an organization use indirect notice, such as a public announcement, instead of contacting people directly?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: A. When direct notice would cause more harm or hardship, or contacts are unknown

    Indirect notice is allowed only when direct notice would cause further harm or undue hardship, or contact information is unavailable.

  17. Domanda 17 di 18

    A breach does not create a real risk of significant harm. What must a PIPEDA organization still do?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: A. Keep a record of it for two years

    Records must be kept of every breach of security safeguards, whether or not it creates a real risk of significant harm, for two years.

  18. Domanda 18 di 18

    Under Alberta's PIPA, when must an organization notify Alberta's Privacy Commissioner of a breach with a real risk of significant harm?
    Mostra la risposta

    Risposta: C. Without unreasonable delay, even before its investigation ends

    Alberta's OIPC says notice must be given without unreasonable delay and should not wait for the internal investigation to finish.

Test correlati