Protecting Workplace Information Course: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report
Themaquiz zonder tijdslimiet: 18 vragen over Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report, met een uitleg na elk antwoord. Vragen en antwoorden worden elke keer gehusseld.
Themaquiz 6: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report
-
Vraag 1 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: B. Loss of, unauthorized access to, or unauthorized disclosure of personal information
PIPEDA defines a breach of security safeguards as the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information.
-
Vraag 2 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: A. Loss
Information that goes missing, including during an office move, is a loss.
-
Vraag 3 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: C. Unauthorized disclosure
Misdirected email, fax or mail is unauthorized disclosure.
-
Vraag 4 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: A. Unauthorized access
An employee viewing records without permission is unauthorized access, even if the information is not shared.
-
Vraag 5 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: B. Looking at personal information without authorization or a business purpose
The OPC defines snooping as accessing personal information without authorization and without a legitimate business purpose.
-
Vraag 6 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: A. Keeping access logs and reviewing them regularly
Access logs and regular audits support investigations and deter snooping when employees know they exist.
-
Vraag 7 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: C. Report it right away to your supervisor or privacy officer
Report possible breaches at once so the organization can contain and assess them; do not investigate on your own.
-
Vraag 8 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: B. Reset the affected passwords right away
The OPC's containment tips include resetting affected passwords immediately when a hacked account caused the breach.
-
Vraag 9 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: D. Wipe its memory remotely
If a laptop is lost or stolen, the OPC suggests wiping its memory remotely if possible.
-
Vraag 10 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: C. It helps find the cause and prevent future breaches
The OPC says preserving evidence helps identify the cause and prevent future breaches.
-
Vraag 11 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: B. Whether it creates a real risk of significant harm
Organizations must report and notify when it is reasonable to believe a breach creates a real risk of significant harm.
-
Vraag 12 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: C. Yes, loss of employment is included
Significant harm includes loss of employment, along with financial loss, identity theft, humiliation and other harms.
-
Vraag 13 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: B. How sensitive the information is and how likely misuse is
The assessment looks at the sensitivity of the information and the probability it will be misused.
-
Vraag 14 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: C. Yes, the same test applies to one person or 1,000
The OPC notes the requirement applies whether a breach affects one person or 1,000.
-
Vraag 15 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: B. As soon as feasible once the risk is found
Individuals must be notified as soon as feasible after the organization determines the breach poses a real risk of significant harm.
-
Vraag 16 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: A. When direct notice would cause more harm or hardship, or contacts are unknown
Indirect notice is allowed only when direct notice would cause further harm or undue hardship, or contact information is unavailable.
-
Vraag 17 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: A. Keep a record of it for two years
Records must be kept of every breach of security safeguards, whether or not it creates a real risk of significant harm, for two years.
-
Vraag 18 van 18
Toon antwoord
Antwoord: C. Without unreasonable delay, even before its investigation ends
Alberta's OIPC says notice must be given without unreasonable delay and should not wait for the internal investigation to finish.
Toetsenbord: 1–4 om te antwoorden, Enter voor de volgende vraag.