Protecting Workplace Information Course: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

Themaquiz zonder tijdslimiet: 18 vragen over Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report, met een uitleg na elk antwoord. Vragen en antwoorden worden elke keer gehusseld.

  • Cursus
  • Canada
  • 98 vragen
  • Gecontroleerd op 13 oktober 2026
  • Feiten gecontroleerd op 13 oktober 2026
Begin met de lessenProtecting Workplace Information Course: Lessons: ongeveer 150 minuten leestijd. Elke testvraag wordt in de lessen behandeld.

Themaquiz 6: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

  1. Vraag 1 van 18

    Under PIPEDA, which three events count as a breach of security safeguards?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: B. Loss of, unauthorized access to, or unauthorized disclosure of personal information

    PIPEDA defines a breach of security safeguards as the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information.

  2. Vraag 2 van 18

    A box of employee files goes missing during an office move. What type of breach is this?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: A. Loss

    Information that goes missing, including during an office move, is a loss.

  3. Vraag 3 van 18

    A fax with patient information goes to the wrong number. What type of breach is this?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: C. Unauthorized disclosure

    Misdirected email, fax or mail is unauthorized disclosure.

  4. Vraag 4 van 18

    A receptionist reads her ex-partner's file in the clinic's system just to see it. What type of breach is this?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: A. Unauthorized access

    An employee viewing records without permission is unauthorized access, even if the information is not shared.

  5. Vraag 5 van 18

    What is employee snooping?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: B. Looking at personal information without authorization or a business purpose

    The OPC defines snooping as accessing personal information without authorization and without a legitimate business purpose.

  6. Vraag 6 van 18

    Which practice helps employers detect and deter employee snooping?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: A. Keeping access logs and reviewing them regularly

    Access logs and regular audits support investigations and deter snooping when employees know they exist.

  7. Vraag 7 van 18

    On Monday morning you find a cabinet of personnel files unlocked and open. It was left that way overnight. What should you do first?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: C. Report it right away to your supervisor or privacy officer

    Report possible breaches at once so the organization can contain and assess them; do not investigate on your own.

  8. Vraag 8 van 18

    A breach was caused by a hacked user account. Which containment step does the OPC list?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: B. Reset the affected passwords right away

    The OPC's containment tips include resetting affected passwords immediately when a hacked account caused the breach.

  9. Vraag 9 van 18

    A laptop with client records is lost. Which containment step does the OPC suggest, if possible?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: D. Wipe its memory remotely

    If a laptop is lost or stolen, the OPC suggests wiping its memory remotely if possible.

  10. Vraag 10 van 18

    Why should evidence be preserved after a breach?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: C. It helps find the cause and prevent future breaches

    The OPC says preserving evidence helps identify the cause and prevent future breaches.

  11. Vraag 11 van 18

    Under PIPEDA, what test decides whether a breach must be reported to the OPC?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: B. Whether it creates a real risk of significant harm

    Organizations must report and notify when it is reasonable to believe a breach creates a real risk of significant harm.

  12. Vraag 12 van 18

    A breach could cause a person to lose their job. Does that count as significant harm under PIPEDA?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: C. Yes, loss of employment is included

    Significant harm includes loss of employment, along with financial loss, identity theft, humiliation and other harms.

  13. Vraag 13 van 18

    Which two main factors decide whether a breach creates a real risk of significant harm?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: B. How sensitive the information is and how likely misuse is

    The assessment looks at the sensitivity of the information and the probability it will be misused.

  14. Vraag 14 van 18

    A breach affects only one customer. Does the real risk of significant harm test still apply?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: C. Yes, the same test applies to one person or 1,000

    The OPC notes the requirement applies whether a breach affects one person or 1,000.

  15. Vraag 15 van 18

    When must the people affected by a reportable breach be notified under PIPEDA?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: B. As soon as feasible once the risk is found

    Individuals must be notified as soon as feasible after the organization determines the breach poses a real risk of significant harm.

  16. Vraag 16 van 18

    When may an organization use indirect notice, such as a public announcement, instead of contacting people directly?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: A. When direct notice would cause more harm or hardship, or contacts are unknown

    Indirect notice is allowed only when direct notice would cause further harm or undue hardship, or contact information is unavailable.

  17. Vraag 17 van 18

    A breach does not create a real risk of significant harm. What must a PIPEDA organization still do?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: A. Keep a record of it for two years

    Records must be kept of every breach of security safeguards, whether or not it creates a real risk of significant harm, for two years.

  18. Vraag 18 van 18

    Under Alberta's PIPA, when must an organization notify Alberta's Privacy Commissioner of a breach with a real risk of significant harm?
    Toon antwoord

    Antwoord: C. Without unreasonable delay, even before its investigation ends

    Alberta's OIPC says notice must be given without unreasonable delay and should not wait for the internal investigation to finish.

Gerelateerde examens