Protecting Workplace Information Course: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report
Prueba temática sin límite de tiempo: 18 preguntas sobre Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report, con una explicación después de cada respuesta. Las preguntas y respuestas se mezclan cada vez.
Prueba temática 6: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report
-
Pregunta 1 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: B. Loss of, unauthorized access to, or unauthorized disclosure of personal information
PIPEDA defines a breach of security safeguards as the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information.
-
Pregunta 2 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: A. Loss
Information that goes missing, including during an office move, is a loss.
-
Pregunta 3 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: C. Unauthorized disclosure
Misdirected email, fax or mail is unauthorized disclosure.
-
Pregunta 4 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: A. Unauthorized access
An employee viewing records without permission is unauthorized access, even if the information is not shared.
-
Pregunta 5 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: B. Looking at personal information without authorization or a business purpose
The OPC defines snooping as accessing personal information without authorization and without a legitimate business purpose.
-
Pregunta 6 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: A. Keeping access logs and reviewing them regularly
Access logs and regular audits support investigations and deter snooping when employees know they exist.
-
Pregunta 7 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: C. Report it right away to your supervisor or privacy officer
Report possible breaches at once so the organization can contain and assess them; do not investigate on your own.
-
Pregunta 8 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: B. Reset the affected passwords right away
The OPC's containment tips include resetting affected passwords immediately when a hacked account caused the breach.
-
Pregunta 9 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: D. Wipe its memory remotely
If a laptop is lost or stolen, the OPC suggests wiping its memory remotely if possible.
-
Pregunta 10 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: C. It helps find the cause and prevent future breaches
The OPC says preserving evidence helps identify the cause and prevent future breaches.
-
Pregunta 11 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: B. Whether it creates a real risk of significant harm
Organizations must report and notify when it is reasonable to believe a breach creates a real risk of significant harm.
-
Pregunta 12 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: C. Yes, loss of employment is included
Significant harm includes loss of employment, along with financial loss, identity theft, humiliation and other harms.
-
Pregunta 13 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: B. How sensitive the information is and how likely misuse is
The assessment looks at the sensitivity of the information and the probability it will be misused.
-
Pregunta 14 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: C. Yes, the same test applies to one person or 1,000
The OPC notes the requirement applies whether a breach affects one person or 1,000.
-
Pregunta 15 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: B. As soon as feasible once the risk is found
Individuals must be notified as soon as feasible after the organization determines the breach poses a real risk of significant harm.
-
Pregunta 16 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: A. When direct notice would cause more harm or hardship, or contacts are unknown
Indirect notice is allowed only when direct notice would cause further harm or undue hardship, or contact information is unavailable.
-
Pregunta 17 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: A. Keep a record of it for two years
Records must be kept of every breach of security safeguards, whether or not it creates a real risk of significant harm, for two years.
-
Pregunta 18 de 18
Ver respuesta
Respuesta: C. Without unreasonable delay, even before its investigation ends
Alberta's OIPC says notice must be given without unreasonable delay and should not wait for the internal investigation to finish.
Teclado: 1–4 para responder, Intro para la siguiente pregunta.