Protecting Workplace Information Course: Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

Quiz thématique sans limite de temps : 18 questions sur Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report, avec une explication après chaque réponse. Les questions et les réponses sont mélangées à chaque fois.

  • Formation
  • Canada
  • 98 questions
  • Vérifié le 13 octobre 2026
  • Vérifié (faits) le 13 octobre 2026
Commencez par les leçonsProtecting Workplace Information Course: Lessons : environ 150 minutes de lecture. Chaque question du test est traitée dans les leçons.

Quiz thématique 6 : Privacy breaches: spot, contain and report

  1. Question 1 sur 18

    Under PIPEDA, which three events count as a breach of security safeguards?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: B. Loss of, unauthorized access to, or unauthorized disclosure of personal information

    PIPEDA defines a breach of security safeguards as the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information.

  2. Question 2 sur 18

    A box of employee files goes missing during an office move. What type of breach is this?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: A. Loss

    Information that goes missing, including during an office move, is a loss.

  3. Question 3 sur 18

    A fax with patient information goes to the wrong number. What type of breach is this?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: C. Unauthorized disclosure

    Misdirected email, fax or mail is unauthorized disclosure.

  4. Question 4 sur 18

    A receptionist reads her ex-partner's file in the clinic's system just to see it. What type of breach is this?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: A. Unauthorized access

    An employee viewing records without permission is unauthorized access, even if the information is not shared.

  5. Question 5 sur 18

    What is employee snooping?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: B. Looking at personal information without authorization or a business purpose

    The OPC defines snooping as accessing personal information without authorization and without a legitimate business purpose.

  6. Question 6 sur 18

    Which practice helps employers detect and deter employee snooping?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: A. Keeping access logs and reviewing them regularly

    Access logs and regular audits support investigations and deter snooping when employees know they exist.

  7. Question 7 sur 18

    On Monday morning you find a cabinet of personnel files unlocked and open. It was left that way overnight. What should you do first?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: C. Report it right away to your supervisor or privacy officer

    Report possible breaches at once so the organization can contain and assess them; do not investigate on your own.

  8. Question 8 sur 18

    A breach was caused by a hacked user account. Which containment step does the OPC list?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: B. Reset the affected passwords right away

    The OPC's containment tips include resetting affected passwords immediately when a hacked account caused the breach.

  9. Question 9 sur 18

    A laptop with client records is lost. Which containment step does the OPC suggest, if possible?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: D. Wipe its memory remotely

    If a laptop is lost or stolen, the OPC suggests wiping its memory remotely if possible.

  10. Question 10 sur 18

    Why should evidence be preserved after a breach?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: C. It helps find the cause and prevent future breaches

    The OPC says preserving evidence helps identify the cause and prevent future breaches.

  11. Question 11 sur 18

    Under PIPEDA, what test decides whether a breach must be reported to the OPC?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: B. Whether it creates a real risk of significant harm

    Organizations must report and notify when it is reasonable to believe a breach creates a real risk of significant harm.

  12. Question 12 sur 18

    A breach could cause a person to lose their job. Does that count as significant harm under PIPEDA?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: C. Yes, loss of employment is included

    Significant harm includes loss of employment, along with financial loss, identity theft, humiliation and other harms.

  13. Question 13 sur 18

    Which two main factors decide whether a breach creates a real risk of significant harm?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: B. How sensitive the information is and how likely misuse is

    The assessment looks at the sensitivity of the information and the probability it will be misused.

  14. Question 14 sur 18

    A breach affects only one customer. Does the real risk of significant harm test still apply?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: C. Yes, the same test applies to one person or 1,000

    The OPC notes the requirement applies whether a breach affects one person or 1,000.

  15. Question 15 sur 18

    When must the people affected by a reportable breach be notified under PIPEDA?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: B. As soon as feasible once the risk is found

    Individuals must be notified as soon as feasible after the organization determines the breach poses a real risk of significant harm.

  16. Question 16 sur 18

    When may an organization use indirect notice, such as a public announcement, instead of contacting people directly?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: A. When direct notice would cause more harm or hardship, or contacts are unknown

    Indirect notice is allowed only when direct notice would cause further harm or undue hardship, or contact information is unavailable.

  17. Question 17 sur 18

    A breach does not create a real risk of significant harm. What must a PIPEDA organization still do?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: A. Keep a record of it for two years

    Records must be kept of every breach of security safeguards, whether or not it creates a real risk of significant harm, for two years.

  18. Question 18 sur 18

    Under Alberta's PIPA, when must an organization notify Alberta's Privacy Commissioner of a breach with a real risk of significant harm?
    Voir la réponse

    Réponse: C. Without unreasonable delay, even before its investigation ends

    Alberta's OIPC says notice must be given without unreasonable delay and should not wait for the internal investigation to finish.

Tests associés