CAEC Science Preparation Course: Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions

Questionário temático sem limite de tempo: 16 perguntas sobre Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions, com uma explicação depois de cada resposta. As perguntas e respostas são baralhadas de cada vez.

  • Curso
  • Canadá
  • 97 perguntas
  • Verificado em 13 de outubro de 2026
  • Verificado em 13 de outubro de 2026
Comece pelas liçõesCAEC Science Preparation: Lessons: cerca de 300 minutos de leitura. Todas as perguntas do teste são abordadas nas lições.

Questionário temático 5: Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions

  1. Pergunta 1 de 16

    In science, what does it mean if results are reliable?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Repeated tests give similar results

    Reliability is about consistency: repeating the test should give similar results.

  2. Pergunta 2 de 16

    What does it mean if an investigation is valid?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: D. It really measures what it claims to

    A valid test measures the right thing in a fair way, with other variables controlled.

  3. Pergunta 3 de 16

    Which trial is most likely an error and should be checked?
    Trial1234
    Reaction time (s)0.310.290.300.52
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Trial 4

    Trials 1–3 are all close to 0.30 s. Trial 4 (0.52 s) is far from the others, so it is an outlier, perhaps caused by a distraction.

  4. Pergunta 4 de 16

    A kitchen scale shows 2 g even when nothing is on it. Every mass measured on it will be 2 g too high. What kind of error is this?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. Systematic error

    A systematic error pushes every measurement the same way by the same amount. Zeroing (taring) the scale fixes it.

  5. Pergunta 5 de 16

    Different students start and stop a stopwatch slightly early or late each time. What is the best way to reduce this kind of error?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: D. Repeat the timing and use the average

    Human reaction time causes random error. Repeating trials and averaging reduces its effect.

  6. Pergunta 6 de 16

    Which conclusion is supported by the data?

    Each jar started with 300 mL of water at 80 °C. All jars were the same size and sat on the same table for 30 minutes.

    Wrap around jarWater temperature after 30 min (°C)
    No wrap52
    Aluminum foil58
    Newspaper61
    Wool sock67
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: D. In this test, the wool sock kept the water warmest

    The wool-wrapped jar stayed warmest (67 °C). The data is about this test only, so broad claims like "every use" go too far.

  7. Pergunta 7 de 16

    How many degrees did the water with no wrap cool down in 30 minutes?

    Each jar started with 300 mL of water at 80 °C. All jars were the same size and sat on the same table for 30 minutes.

    Wrap around jarWater temperature after 30 min (°C)
    No wrap52
    Aluminum foil58
    Newspaper61
    Wool sock67
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: D. 28 °C

    It started at 80 °C and ended at 52 °C: 80 − 52 = 28 °C.

  8. Pergunta 8 de 16

    You want to keep soup hot in a jar for a field trip. How can you best apply the results of this investigation?

    Each jar started with 300 mL of water at 80 °C. All jars were the same size and sat on the same table for 30 minutes.

    Wrap around jarWater temperature after 30 min (°C)
    No wrap52
    Aluminum foil58
    Newspaper61
    Wool sock67
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. Wrap the jar in a wool sock

    The investigation showed wool kept water hottest, so it is the best choice from the materials tested.

  9. Pergunta 9 de 16

    Which study's results are more reliable and credible, and why?
    StudyPeople testedHow people were chosenPublished
    A18Volunteers who answered an online adCompany website
    B1,200Chosen at random from several citiesPeer-reviewed journal
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: B. Study B: large random sample, peer-reviewed

    Study B used many people chosen at random and passed peer review. Study A had few self-selected volunteers and no independent check.

  10. Pergunta 10 de 16

    A study found that towns with more ice cream sales also have more drownings. What is the best explanation?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: A. Hot weather raises both; one need not cause the other

    Two things that change together are correlated, but that does not prove one causes the other. A third factor, hot weather, can explain both.

  11. Pergunta 11 de 16

    A new hand cream helped the skin of 10 mice in one lab. The company says it "works for everyone." What is wrong with this claim?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. It overgeneralizes from a small test on animals

    A small test on mice does not show what will happen in all people. More testing in people is needed.

  12. Pergunta 12 de 16

    A friend says, "My cousin drank celery juice and her cold went away, so celery juice cures colds." Why is this weak evidence?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. It is one story with no comparison group

    One personal story (an anecdote) has no control group. The cold might have ended without the juice.

  13. Pergunta 13 de 16

    In an experiment on how temperature affects how fast sugar dissolves, a student stirred some cups but not others. How does this affect the results?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: A. Less valid: stirring was not controlled

    Stirring also speeds up dissolving. Because it was not kept the same, you cannot tell whether temperature or stirring caused the differences.

  14. Pergunta 14 de 16

    A student found that seeds sprouted fastest at 25 °C out of the temperatures 5, 15 and 25 °C. What is a sensible next investigation?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Test temperatures above 25 °C

    The best temperature might be higher than 25 °C. Testing beyond the range, while changing one variable at a time, extends the conclusion.

  15. Pergunta 15 de 16

    Which source is usually the most credible for a claim about a new medicine?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: D. A peer-reviewed study by independent researchers

    Peer-reviewed research by independent scientists is checked by experts and less likely to be biased.

  16. Pergunta 16 de 16

    A student measured the temperature of a cup of water once, with the bulb of the thermometer not fully in the water. What is the best way to improve the investigation?
    Mostrar resposta

    Resposta: C. Put the bulb fully in the water and take several readings

    Using the tool correctly fixes a source of error, and repeated readings make the result more reliable.

Testes relacionados