CAEC Science Preparation Course: Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions

Themenquiz ohne Zeitlimit: 16 Fragen zu Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions, mit einer Erklärung nach jeder Antwort. Fragen und Antworten werden jedes Mal neu gemischt.

  • Kurs
  • Kanada
  • 97 Fragen
  • Geprüft am 13. Oktober 2026
  • Faktengeprüft am 13. Oktober 2026
Beginnen Sie mit den LektionenCAEC Science Preparation: Lessons: etwa 300 Minuten Lesezeit. Jede Testfrage wird in den Lektionen behandelt.

Themenquiz 5: Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions

  1. Frage 1 von 16

    In science, what does it mean if results are reliable?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: C. Repeated tests give similar results

    Reliability is about consistency: repeating the test should give similar results.

  2. Frage 2 von 16

    What does it mean if an investigation is valid?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: D. It really measures what it claims to

    A valid test measures the right thing in a fair way, with other variables controlled.

  3. Frage 3 von 16

    Which trial is most likely an error and should be checked?
    Trial1234
    Reaction time (s)0.310.290.300.52
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: C. Trial 4

    Trials 1–3 are all close to 0.30 s. Trial 4 (0.52 s) is far from the others, so it is an outlier, perhaps caused by a distraction.

  4. Frage 4 von 16

    A kitchen scale shows 2 g even when nothing is on it. Every mass measured on it will be 2 g too high. What kind of error is this?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: B. Systematic error

    A systematic error pushes every measurement the same way by the same amount. Zeroing (taring) the scale fixes it.

  5. Frage 5 von 16

    Different students start and stop a stopwatch slightly early or late each time. What is the best way to reduce this kind of error?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: D. Repeat the timing and use the average

    Human reaction time causes random error. Repeating trials and averaging reduces its effect.

  6. Frage 6 von 16

    Which conclusion is supported by the data?

    Each jar started with 300 mL of water at 80 °C. All jars were the same size and sat on the same table for 30 minutes.

    Wrap around jarWater temperature after 30 min (°C)
    No wrap52
    Aluminum foil58
    Newspaper61
    Wool sock67
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: D. In this test, the wool sock kept the water warmest

    The wool-wrapped jar stayed warmest (67 °C). The data is about this test only, so broad claims like "every use" go too far.

  7. Frage 7 von 16

    How many degrees did the water with no wrap cool down in 30 minutes?

    Each jar started with 300 mL of water at 80 °C. All jars were the same size and sat on the same table for 30 minutes.

    Wrap around jarWater temperature after 30 min (°C)
    No wrap52
    Aluminum foil58
    Newspaper61
    Wool sock67
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: D. 28 °C

    It started at 80 °C and ended at 52 °C: 80 − 52 = 28 °C.

  8. Frage 8 von 16

    You want to keep soup hot in a jar for a field trip. How can you best apply the results of this investigation?

    Each jar started with 300 mL of water at 80 °C. All jars were the same size and sat on the same table for 30 minutes.

    Wrap around jarWater temperature after 30 min (°C)
    No wrap52
    Aluminum foil58
    Newspaper61
    Wool sock67
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: B. Wrap the jar in a wool sock

    The investigation showed wool kept water hottest, so it is the best choice from the materials tested.

  9. Frage 9 von 16

    Which study's results are more reliable and credible, and why?
    StudyPeople testedHow people were chosenPublished
    A18Volunteers who answered an online adCompany website
    B1,200Chosen at random from several citiesPeer-reviewed journal
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: B. Study B: large random sample, peer-reviewed

    Study B used many people chosen at random and passed peer review. Study A had few self-selected volunteers and no independent check.

  10. Frage 10 von 16

    A study found that towns with more ice cream sales also have more drownings. What is the best explanation?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: A. Hot weather raises both; one need not cause the other

    Two things that change together are correlated, but that does not prove one causes the other. A third factor, hot weather, can explain both.

  11. Frage 11 von 16

    A new hand cream helped the skin of 10 mice in one lab. The company says it "works for everyone." What is wrong with this claim?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: C. It overgeneralizes from a small test on animals

    A small test on mice does not show what will happen in all people. More testing in people is needed.

  12. Frage 12 von 16

    A friend says, "My cousin drank celery juice and her cold went away, so celery juice cures colds." Why is this weak evidence?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: C. It is one story with no comparison group

    One personal story (an anecdote) has no control group. The cold might have ended without the juice.

  13. Frage 13 von 16

    In an experiment on how temperature affects how fast sugar dissolves, a student stirred some cups but not others. How does this affect the results?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: A. Less valid: stirring was not controlled

    Stirring also speeds up dissolving. Because it was not kept the same, you cannot tell whether temperature or stirring caused the differences.

  14. Frage 14 von 16

    A student found that seeds sprouted fastest at 25 °C out of the temperatures 5, 15 and 25 °C. What is a sensible next investigation?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: C. Test temperatures above 25 °C

    The best temperature might be higher than 25 °C. Testing beyond the range, while changing one variable at a time, extends the conclusion.

  15. Frage 15 von 16

    Which source is usually the most credible for a claim about a new medicine?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: D. A peer-reviewed study by independent researchers

    Peer-reviewed research by independent scientists is checked by experts and less likely to be biased.

  16. Frage 16 von 16

    A student measured the temperature of a cup of water once, with the bulb of the thermometer not fully in the water. What is the best way to improve the investigation?
    Antwort anzeigen

    Antwort: C. Put the bulb fully in the water and take several readings

    Using the tool correctly fixes a source of error, and repeated readings make the result more reliable.

Ähnliche Tests