CAEC Science Preparation Course: Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions
Themenquiz ohne Zeitlimit: 16 Fragen zu Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions, mit einer Erklärung nach jeder Antwort. Fragen und Antworten werden jedes Mal neu gemischt.
Themenquiz 5: Inquiry: error, reliability and conclusions
-
Frage 1 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: C. Repeated tests give similar results
Reliability is about consistency: repeating the test should give similar results.
-
Frage 2 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: D. It really measures what it claims to
A valid test measures the right thing in a fair way, with other variables controlled.
-
Frage 3 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: C. Trial 4
Trials 1–3 are all close to 0.30 s. Trial 4 (0.52 s) is far from the others, so it is an outlier, perhaps caused by a distraction.
-
Frage 4 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: B. Systematic error
A systematic error pushes every measurement the same way by the same amount. Zeroing (taring) the scale fixes it.
-
Frage 5 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: D. Repeat the timing and use the average
Human reaction time causes random error. Repeating trials and averaging reduces its effect.
-
Frage 6 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: D. In this test, the wool sock kept the water warmest
The wool-wrapped jar stayed warmest (67 °C). The data is about this test only, so broad claims like "every use" go too far.
-
Frage 7 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: D. 28 °C
It started at 80 °C and ended at 52 °C: 80 − 52 = 28 °C.
-
Frage 8 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: B. Wrap the jar in a wool sock
The investigation showed wool kept water hottest, so it is the best choice from the materials tested.
-
Frage 9 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: B. Study B: large random sample, peer-reviewed
Study B used many people chosen at random and passed peer review. Study A had few self-selected volunteers and no independent check.
-
Frage 10 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: A. Hot weather raises both; one need not cause the other
Two things that change together are correlated, but that does not prove one causes the other. A third factor, hot weather, can explain both.
-
Frage 11 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: C. It overgeneralizes from a small test on animals
A small test on mice does not show what will happen in all people. More testing in people is needed.
-
Frage 12 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: C. It is one story with no comparison group
One personal story (an anecdote) has no control group. The cold might have ended without the juice.
-
Frage 13 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: A. Less valid: stirring was not controlled
Stirring also speeds up dissolving. Because it was not kept the same, you cannot tell whether temperature or stirring caused the differences.
-
Frage 14 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: C. Test temperatures above 25 °C
The best temperature might be higher than 25 °C. Testing beyond the range, while changing one variable at a time, extends the conclusion.
-
Frage 15 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: D. A peer-reviewed study by independent researchers
Peer-reviewed research by independent scientists is checked by experts and less likely to be biased.
-
Frage 16 von 16
Antwort anzeigen
Antwort: C. Put the bulb fully in the water and take several readings
Using the tool correctly fixes a source of error, and repeated readings make the result more reliable.
Tastatur: 1–4 zum Antworten, Eingabetaste für die nächste Frage.
Die echte Prüfung: 55% on each CAEC test