CELPIP Listening Practice Course: Part 6: Listening for Viewpoints
Quiz thématique sans limite de temps : 15 questions sur Part 6: Listening for Viewpoints, avec une explication après chaque réponse. Les questions et les réponses sont mélangées à chaque fois.
Quiz thématique 7 : Part 6: Listening for Viewpoints
-
Question 1 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: B. One speaker giving a prepared, formal talk
Part 6 is one speaker, formal and not improvised, presenting different views on an issue. It may include less common or specialized words.
-
Question 2 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: D. The issue, each person's last name, their opinion and their reason
Part 6 questions ask about the issue, who is mentioned and what they think and why. A simple table with those columns works well.
-
Question 3 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: A. A different or opposing viewpoint
Phrases like "on the other side", "however" and "critics say" signal that a new or opposing viewpoint is coming.
-
Question 4 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: D. return to the office full time
The speaker introduces the question: should office workers be required to return to the office full time?
Transcription
Good evening. Tonight we look at a question that many employers across the country are facing. Should office workers be required to return to the office full time?
Supporters of a full return make several arguments. Diane Liu runs an engineering firm with eighty staff. She says her newer employees learn much faster when they sit near experienced colleagues. According to Liu, young engineers used to pick up skills simply by overhearing how senior staff solved problems, and video calls do not replace that. Downtown business groups agree, but for a different reason. Restaurants and shops near office towers depend on daily office workers, and many have lost a large part of their lunch business.
On the other side, many employees say working from home has made their lives better. Software tester Ahmed Farouk says he saves almost two hours a day by not commuting, and he uses that time to exercise and to be with his children. Farouk argues that his work should be measured by results, not by where he sits.
Some experts suggest a middle path. Workplace consultant Helen Moreau says the real question is not where people work, but why they come together. In her view, offices should be used for activities that truly need people in the same room, such as training, planning and team building, while focused individual work can be done at home. Moreau warns that forcing a full return without a clear reason may cause skilled workers to look for jobs elsewhere.
For now, most employers are still experimenting, and the debate is far from over.
-
Question 5 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: C. newer staff learn faster near experienced colleagues
Liu says newer employees learn faster when they sit near experienced colleagues, and video calls do not replace that.
Transcription
Good evening. Tonight we look at a question that many employers across the country are facing. Should office workers be required to return to the office full time?
Supporters of a full return make several arguments. Diane Liu runs an engineering firm with eighty staff. She says her newer employees learn much faster when they sit near experienced colleagues. According to Liu, young engineers used to pick up skills simply by overhearing how senior staff solved problems, and video calls do not replace that. Downtown business groups agree, but for a different reason. Restaurants and shops near office towers depend on daily office workers, and many have lost a large part of their lunch business.
On the other side, many employees say working from home has made their lives better. Software tester Ahmed Farouk says he saves almost two hours a day by not commuting, and he uses that time to exercise and to be with his children. Farouk argues that his work should be measured by results, not by where he sits.
Some experts suggest a middle path. Workplace consultant Helen Moreau says the real question is not where people work, but why they come together. In her view, offices should be used for activities that truly need people in the same room, such as training, planning and team building, while focused individual work can be done at home. Moreau warns that forcing a full return without a clear reason may cause skilled workers to look for jobs elsewhere.
For now, most employers are still experimenting, and the debate is far from over.
-
Question 6 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: B. nearby shops and restaurants rely on office workers
The speaker says restaurants and shops near office towers depend on daily office workers and have lost lunch business.
Transcription
Good evening. Tonight we look at a question that many employers across the country are facing. Should office workers be required to return to the office full time?
Supporters of a full return make several arguments. Diane Liu runs an engineering firm with eighty staff. She says her newer employees learn much faster when they sit near experienced colleagues. According to Liu, young engineers used to pick up skills simply by overhearing how senior staff solved problems, and video calls do not replace that. Downtown business groups agree, but for a different reason. Restaurants and shops near office towers depend on daily office workers, and many have lost a large part of their lunch business.
On the other side, many employees say working from home has made their lives better. Software tester Ahmed Farouk says he saves almost two hours a day by not commuting, and he uses that time to exercise and to be with his children. Farouk argues that his work should be measured by results, not by where he sits.
Some experts suggest a middle path. Workplace consultant Helen Moreau says the real question is not where people work, but why they come together. In her view, offices should be used for activities that truly need people in the same room, such as training, planning and team building, while focused individual work can be done at home. Moreau warns that forcing a full return without a clear reason may cause skilled workers to look for jobs elsewhere.
For now, most employers are still experimenting, and the debate is far from over.
-
Question 7 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: D. saves him time for exercise and family
Farouk saves almost two hours a day by not commuting and uses that time to exercise and be with his children.
Transcription
Good evening. Tonight we look at a question that many employers across the country are facing. Should office workers be required to return to the office full time?
Supporters of a full return make several arguments. Diane Liu runs an engineering firm with eighty staff. She says her newer employees learn much faster when they sit near experienced colleagues. According to Liu, young engineers used to pick up skills simply by overhearing how senior staff solved problems, and video calls do not replace that. Downtown business groups agree, but for a different reason. Restaurants and shops near office towers depend on daily office workers, and many have lost a large part of their lunch business.
On the other side, many employees say working from home has made their lives better. Software tester Ahmed Farouk says he saves almost two hours a day by not commuting, and he uses that time to exercise and to be with his children. Farouk argues that his work should be measured by results, not by where he sits.
Some experts suggest a middle path. Workplace consultant Helen Moreau says the real question is not where people work, but why they come together. In her view, offices should be used for activities that truly need people in the same room, such as training, planning and team building, while focused individual work can be done at home. Moreau warns that forcing a full return without a clear reason may cause skilled workers to look for jobs elsewhere.
For now, most employers are still experimenting, and the debate is far from over.
-
Question 8 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: D. activities that need people in one room
Moreau says offices should be used for activities that truly need people in the same room, while focused individual work can be done at home.
Transcription
Good evening. Tonight we look at a question that many employers across the country are facing. Should office workers be required to return to the office full time?
Supporters of a full return make several arguments. Diane Liu runs an engineering firm with eighty staff. She says her newer employees learn much faster when they sit near experienced colleagues. According to Liu, young engineers used to pick up skills simply by overhearing how senior staff solved problems, and video calls do not replace that. Downtown business groups agree, but for a different reason. Restaurants and shops near office towers depend on daily office workers, and many have lost a large part of their lunch business.
On the other side, many employees say working from home has made their lives better. Software tester Ahmed Farouk says he saves almost two hours a day by not commuting, and he uses that time to exercise and to be with his children. Farouk argues that his work should be measured by results, not by where he sits.
Some experts suggest a middle path. Workplace consultant Helen Moreau says the real question is not where people work, but why they come together. In her view, offices should be used for activities that truly need people in the same room, such as training, planning and team building, while focused individual work can be done at home. Moreau warns that forcing a full return without a clear reason may cause skilled workers to look for jobs elsewhere.
For now, most employers are still experimenting, and the debate is far from over.
-
Question 9 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: C. cause skilled workers to look for other jobs
Moreau warns that a forced return without a clear reason may cause skilled workers to look for jobs elsewhere.
Transcription
Good evening. Tonight we look at a question that many employers across the country are facing. Should office workers be required to return to the office full time?
Supporters of a full return make several arguments. Diane Liu runs an engineering firm with eighty staff. She says her newer employees learn much faster when they sit near experienced colleagues. According to Liu, young engineers used to pick up skills simply by overhearing how senior staff solved problems, and video calls do not replace that. Downtown business groups agree, but for a different reason. Restaurants and shops near office towers depend on daily office workers, and many have lost a large part of their lunch business.
On the other side, many employees say working from home has made their lives better. Software tester Ahmed Farouk says he saves almost two hours a day by not commuting, and he uses that time to exercise and to be with his children. Farouk argues that his work should be measured by results, not by where he sits.
Some experts suggest a middle path. Workplace consultant Helen Moreau says the real question is not where people work, but why they come together. In her view, offices should be used for activities that truly need people in the same room, such as training, planning and team building, while focused individual work can be done at home. Moreau warns that forcing a full return without a clear reason may cause skilled workers to look for jobs elsewhere.
For now, most employers are still experimenting, and the debate is far from over.
-
Question 10 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: A. ban phones for the whole school day
Many schools already limit phones in class. The question in the report is whether to ban them for the whole day, including lunch and breaks.
Transcription
Across Canada, many schools now limit the use of cellphones during class time. But should phones be banned for the whole school day, including lunch and breaks? Here are some of the views in this debate.
Principal Robert Tremblay supports a full-day ban at his high school. He says that when students could use their phones at lunch, many sat alone scrolling instead of talking to each other. Since the ban started, he says, the cafeteria is much louder, and he means that as a good thing. Teachers at his school also report fewer arguments that start online and continue in the hallways.
Many parents, however, have concerns. Parent council chair Jasmine Kaur says families want to be able to reach their children in an emergency, or when plans change after school. Kaur does not object to rules during lessons, but she thinks a full-day ban goes too far. She would prefer to let students use their phones at lunch, in one set area.
Students have their own ideas. Grade 12 student Owen MacLeod points out that some students use their phones to manage their health, for example to check their blood sugar, and they should never have to ask permission. MacLeod also argues that schools should teach students how to manage their screen time, instead of simply taking phones away, because after graduation, nobody will take their phones away.
Tremblay replies that students with medical needs are already exempt from the ban at his school, and that families can always call the school office in an emergency.
-
Question 11 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: C. is louder because students talk more
Tremblay says the cafeteria is much louder, and he means that as a good thing: students are talking instead of scrolling.
Transcription
Across Canada, many schools now limit the use of cellphones during class time. But should phones be banned for the whole school day, including lunch and breaks? Here are some of the views in this debate.
Principal Robert Tremblay supports a full-day ban at his high school. He says that when students could use their phones at lunch, many sat alone scrolling instead of talking to each other. Since the ban started, he says, the cafeteria is much louder, and he means that as a good thing. Teachers at his school also report fewer arguments that start online and continue in the hallways.
Many parents, however, have concerns. Parent council chair Jasmine Kaur says families want to be able to reach their children in an emergency, or when plans change after school. Kaur does not object to rules during lessons, but she thinks a full-day ban goes too far. She would prefer to let students use their phones at lunch, in one set area.
Students have their own ideas. Grade 12 student Owen MacLeod points out that some students use their phones to manage their health, for example to check their blood sugar, and they should never have to ask permission. MacLeod also argues that schools should teach students how to manage their screen time, instead of simply taking phones away, because after graduation, nobody will take their phones away.
Tremblay replies that students with medical needs are already exempt from the ban at his school, and that families can always call the school office in an emergency.
-
Question 12 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: A. families could not reach their children
Kaur says families want to be able to reach their children in an emergency or when plans change after school.
Transcription
Across Canada, many schools now limit the use of cellphones during class time. But should phones be banned for the whole school day, including lunch and breaks? Here are some of the views in this debate.
Principal Robert Tremblay supports a full-day ban at his high school. He says that when students could use their phones at lunch, many sat alone scrolling instead of talking to each other. Since the ban started, he says, the cafeteria is much louder, and he means that as a good thing. Teachers at his school also report fewer arguments that start online and continue in the hallways.
Many parents, however, have concerns. Parent council chair Jasmine Kaur says families want to be able to reach their children in an emergency, or when plans change after school. Kaur does not object to rules during lessons, but she thinks a full-day ban goes too far. She would prefer to let students use their phones at lunch, in one set area.
Students have their own ideas. Grade 12 student Owen MacLeod points out that some students use their phones to manage their health, for example to check their blood sugar, and they should never have to ask permission. MacLeod also argues that schools should teach students how to manage their screen time, instead of simply taking phones away, because after graduation, nobody will take their phones away.
Tremblay replies that students with medical needs are already exempt from the ban at his school, and that families can always call the school office in an emergency.
-
Question 13 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: C. allowing phones at lunch in one area
Kaur accepts rules during lessons, but would prefer to let students use their phones at lunch in one set area.
Transcription
Across Canada, many schools now limit the use of cellphones during class time. But should phones be banned for the whole school day, including lunch and breaks? Here are some of the views in this debate.
Principal Robert Tremblay supports a full-day ban at his high school. He says that when students could use their phones at lunch, many sat alone scrolling instead of talking to each other. Since the ban started, he says, the cafeteria is much louder, and he means that as a good thing. Teachers at his school also report fewer arguments that start online and continue in the hallways.
Many parents, however, have concerns. Parent council chair Jasmine Kaur says families want to be able to reach their children in an emergency, or when plans change after school. Kaur does not object to rules during lessons, but she thinks a full-day ban goes too far. She would prefer to let students use their phones at lunch, in one set area.
Students have their own ideas. Grade 12 student Owen MacLeod points out that some students use their phones to manage their health, for example to check their blood sugar, and they should never have to ask permission. MacLeod also argues that schools should teach students how to manage their screen time, instead of simply taking phones away, because after graduation, nobody will take their phones away.
Tremblay replies that students with medical needs are already exempt from the ban at his school, and that families can always call the school office in an emergency.
-
Question 14 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: A. teach students how to manage their screen time
MacLeod argues that schools should teach students to manage screen time instead of simply taking phones away.
Transcription
Across Canada, many schools now limit the use of cellphones during class time. But should phones be banned for the whole school day, including lunch and breaks? Here are some of the views in this debate.
Principal Robert Tremblay supports a full-day ban at his high school. He says that when students could use their phones at lunch, many sat alone scrolling instead of talking to each other. Since the ban started, he says, the cafeteria is much louder, and he means that as a good thing. Teachers at his school also report fewer arguments that start online and continue in the hallways.
Many parents, however, have concerns. Parent council chair Jasmine Kaur says families want to be able to reach their children in an emergency, or when plans change after school. Kaur does not object to rules during lessons, but she thinks a full-day ban goes too far. She would prefer to let students use their phones at lunch, in one set area.
Students have their own ideas. Grade 12 student Owen MacLeod points out that some students use their phones to manage their health, for example to check their blood sugar, and they should never have to ask permission. MacLeod also argues that schools should teach students how to manage their screen time, instead of simply taking phones away, because after graduation, nobody will take their phones away.
Tremblay replies that students with medical needs are already exempt from the ban at his school, and that families can always call the school office in an emergency.
-
Question 15 sur 15
Voir la réponse
Réponse: C. are already exempt from the ban at his school
Tremblay replies that students with medical needs are already exempt, which means the ban does not apply to them.
Transcription
Across Canada, many schools now limit the use of cellphones during class time. But should phones be banned for the whole school day, including lunch and breaks? Here are some of the views in this debate.
Principal Robert Tremblay supports a full-day ban at his high school. He says that when students could use their phones at lunch, many sat alone scrolling instead of talking to each other. Since the ban started, he says, the cafeteria is much louder, and he means that as a good thing. Teachers at his school also report fewer arguments that start online and continue in the hallways.
Many parents, however, have concerns. Parent council chair Jasmine Kaur says families want to be able to reach their children in an emergency, or when plans change after school. Kaur does not object to rules during lessons, but she thinks a full-day ban goes too far. She would prefer to let students use their phones at lunch, in one set area.
Students have their own ideas. Grade 12 student Owen MacLeod points out that some students use their phones to manage their health, for example to check their blood sugar, and they should never have to ask permission. MacLeod also argues that schools should teach students how to manage their screen time, instead of simply taking phones away, because after graduation, nobody will take their phones away.
Tremblay replies that students with medical needs are already exempt from the ban at his school, and that families can always call the school office in an emergency.
Clavier : 1–4 pour répondre, Entrée pour la question suivante.